Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: THEend8_
This front sheet for assignments is designed to contain the brief, the submission instructions, and the actual student submission for any WMG assignment. As a result the sheet is completed by several people over time, and is therefore split up into sections explaining who completes what information and when. Yellow highlighted text indicates examples or further explanation of what is requested, and the highlight and instructions should be removed as you populate ‘your’ section.
This sheet is only to be used for components of assessment worth more than 3 CATS (e.g. for a 15 credit module, weighted more than 20%; or for a 10 credit module, weighted more than 30%).
To be completed by the student(s) prior to final submission:
Your actual submission should be written at the end of this cover sheet file, or attached with the cover sheet at the front if drafted in a separate file, program or application.
|
Student ID or IDs for group work |
e.g. 1234567 |
To be completed (highlighted parts only) by the programme administration after approval and prior to issuing of the assessment; to be consulted by the student(s) so that you know how and when to submit:
|
Date set |
9th June 2024
|
|
Submission date (excluding extensions) |
BEFORE 12:00 noon UK time on Monday 22 July 2024
|
|
Submission guidance |
To be submitted electronically in ONE file (instead of separate files) in supported types (e.g. MS Word, Acrobat PDF, and maximum file size is 40MB) via Tabula |
|
Marks return date (excluding extensions) |
19 August 2024 Latest date that marks can be returned to the students (i.e. the 20 day turnaround)
|
|
Late submission policy |
If work is submitted late, penalties will be applied at the rate of 5 marks per University working day after the due date, up to a maximum of 10 working days late. After this period the mark for the work will be reduced to 0 (which is the maximum penalty). “Late” means after the submission deadline time as well as the date – work submitted after the given time even on the same day is counted as 1 day late. For Postgraduate students only, who started their current course before 1 August 2019, the daily penalty is 3 marks rather than 5. |
|
Resubmission policy |
If you fail this assignment or module, please be aware that the University allows students to remedy such failure (within certain limits). Decisions to authorise such resubmissions are made by Exam Boards. Normally these will be issued at specific times of the year, depending on your programme of study. More information can be found from your programme office if you are concerned. If this is already a resubmission attempt, this means you will not be eligible for an additional attempt. The University allows as standard a maximum of two attempts on any assessment (i.e. only one resubmission). Students can only have a third attempt under exceptional circumstances via a Mitigating Circumstances Panel decision. |
To be completed by the module owner/tutor prior to approval and issuing of the assessment; to be consulted by the student(s) so that you understand the assignment brief, its context within the module, and any specific criteria and advice from the tutor:
|
Module title & code |
ES9v9-10 A5 A6 A7 HK WMG-HK-PU 23-24 HKPU_WKE Industrial Engineering for Business Improvement |
|
Module tutor |
See Above
|
|
Assessment type |
ESSAY
|
|
Weighting of mark |
80% ESSAY ( + 20% In Module case study assessment ) |
|
Assessment brief
|
|
This PMA applies to both part time and full time participants in the IEBI module. Full time students should address the action requirements as presented. Part Time students can relate their responses to their working environment where applicable. If at the time of preparation a part time student cannot do this then respond to the question requirements as a pseudo Full time student. Whatever the case maybe, please be scholarly in responding to the questions, appropriate to a MSc level of participation.
This PMA
Both questions must be answered in full. This requirement also applies to all parts of a question where applicable.
continued Question 1 ( 2 parts ) Subject Domain: MUDAS and their challenges ( within the context of the Module ) The application of Work Measurement techniques, Method Study / Layout Design tools and procedures. The reduction and elimination of waste is a fundamental task of IEBI. A) Debate the interpretation of the key wastes ( MUDAS ) explored in the module. What insights do you think should be presented ? 25 marks 1000 words
B) Given your response to A) above, briefly discuss how you would deploy * i) Method Study ii) Layout Design iii) Work Measurement
*Attempt to include the full set of tools/techniques examined in the module. Avoid the temptation to explore/debate/include for example: SPC,TPM,TQM,Heijunka,VSM 25 marks 1000 words
Question 2
Subject Domain: Ergonomic Risk Factor Analysis, Body Part Mapping, Ergonomics ( physical / cognitive ) Work Station Envelopes, Motion Economy Principles,
Following on from the Flow Line Planning Case Study presented in the Module, discuss the Ergonomic Risk factors and the Workspace Envelope requirements that need to be considered. Interlace your discussion with Authentic / Related statistics where applicable* either from the Health and Safety Executive UK or the Hong Kong Health Authority. *N.B. This does not preclude you from using data/illustrations/tables from other sources such as the International Labour Office or the Hong Kong Poly U Health and Safety Unit. 50 marks 1500 – 2000 words
When presenting your responses, please consider the overall grading categories provided at the end of this PMA. It provides guidelines as to what type of scholarly effort you should strive for !
|
|
|
|
Word count
|
Total 4000 to 4500 max no penalty for going over. |
|
Module learning outcomes (numbered) |
1 Critically Evaluate the range of Industrial Engineering tools and techniques in reducing non-value added work in all its contexts ( physical and cognitive ). 2 Demonstrate and where applicable synthesise, key elements of this specialised field of study with other relevant disciplines to promote better organisational efficiency and effectiveness. 3 Initiate, formulate and defend suitable plans for change within a variety of business contexts.
|
|
Learning outcomes assessed in this assessment (numbered) |
1, 2 & 3 Fully |
|
Marking guidelines |
The overall marking context for Q1 / Q2 is provided on page 6 of 7 of this document which is distributed as part of the PMA. Page 7 of 7 specifically suggests what is required to achieve 70+ against question ( or part of ) and forms the basis of comparison alongside the overall marking context. |
|
Academic guidance resources |
Think Tank sessions to be conducted after the module as in previous years. Students are directed to Reading materials, videos, government and institutional papers where applicable . |
The following is pre-populated for PGT assignments only:
|
Writing your Post-Module Assignment (PMA): specific additional advice for WMG’s Postgraduate Taught Students
|
|
As a postgraduate level student in WMG you may have some concerns about your ability to write at the high standard required. This short guide is intended to provide general guidance and advice. It is important that if you have any questions you discuss them with your module tutor. Remember, in writing your PMA you need to meet the expectations of the reader and university.
|
|
A good PMA generally requires you to answer the question and to include…
1. A title, with your student number, module, lecturer’s name and any other documentation required by the university. 2. A contents page and if appropriate, an abstract. 3. An introduction which acts as a ‘map’ to the rest of the document, describing the aim or purpose of the work and explaining how this aim is achieved. At this point it is usually helpful to paraphrase your conclusion. 4. Evidence of an appropriate level of background reading of relevant texts. 5. Evidence of systematic and clear thinking, indicative of good planning and organisation. 6. Writing which makes sense, is clearly and carefully presented (proof-read and grammar checked). 7. A critical style. of writing which compares and contrasts the main theories, concepts and arguments with conclusions that are based in evidence presented. 8. A logical and well-defined structure with headings and subheadings. 9. Clearly labelled and well-presented diagrams and other graphics that are discussed in the text. 10. Adherence to usual academic standards including length and a timely submission. 11. A reference section in which every source that is cited in the text is listed and please ensure that you underpin the discussion throughout with relevant academic material to support the content, using the Harvard approach.
|
|
Where to get help:
1. Talk to your module tutor if you don’t understand the question or are unsure as to exactly what is required. 2. Study, Professional and Analytical Skills (SPA) Moodle site – we have a lot of resources on this website with workbooks, links and other helpful tools. https://moodle.warwick.ac.uk/ 3. There are also numerous online courses provided by the University library to help in academic referencing, writing, avoiding plagiarism and a number of other useful resources. https://warwick.ac.uk/services/library/students/your-library-online/ 4. Wellbeing support services https://warwick.ac.uk/services/wss |
- 经济Economics
- 金融Finance
- 会计Accounting
- 工商管理Business Management
- 计算机computer science
- 商业分析business analysis
- 法律Law
- 管理Management
- 市场营销Marketing
- 哲学Philosophy
- 心理学Psychology
- 物理Physical
- 统计学statistics
- 电气工程electric engineering
- 化学chemistry
- 生物biology
- 数学mathematics
- 语言学linguistics
- 土木工程civil engineering
- 工程力学engineering mechanics
- 艺术art
PROFESSIONAL HELP!
在线咨询
立即下单
Wechat：THEend8_ 
Email：