Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: THEend8_
FIT3174 IT Strategy and Governance
Assignment 1: Group Assignment
Criteria N (fail) Pass (P) Credit (C) Distinction (D) High Distinction (HD)
Depth of analysis.
Does the report demonstrate
the students’ ability to carry
out a critical analysis on the
assigned topics?
⬜ The report has not
adequately responded to
the assigned topics and task
requirements.
⬜ The report does not
contain enough information
about the topics and task
requirements to adequately
build the intellectual
foundations for this unit.
⬜ The report
generally responds to the
assigned topics though
there may be some
inconsistencies in the
discussions.
⬜ The report contains
an adequate discussion
about the purpose of the
assigned topics. There is
evidence of a general
understanding of the
intellectual foundations of this
unit, though there may be
traces of misconceptions.
⬜ The report generally
responds to the assigned
topics and task requirement
though there may be some
consistencies in the
discussions.
⬜ The analysis
demonstrated emerging
fluency in key concepts.
⬜ The report contains
an adequate discussion
about the assigned topics.
⬜ There is evidence of
a good understanding of the
intellectual foundations of this
unit.
⬜ The report responds
clearly and systematically to
the assigned topics and task
requirements, addressing all
topics/sub- topics relating to
the assignment.
⬜ The report contains
clearly structured
information and discussion
about the assigned topics.
⬜ The analysis shows
the ability to master key
concepts with some
originality.
⬜ There is evidence
of an excellent
understanding of the
intellectual foundations of
this unit.
⬜ The report
responds clearly and
systematically to the
assigned topics and task
requirements; discussions
include not just the
topics/subtopics but also
related topics e.g.,
considering emerging
issues/concepts or
technologies.
⬜ The report
contains clearly structured
information and
discussion about the
assigned topics. The
analysis demonstrates
originality, creativity, and
sophisticated thinking,
which not only shows an
excellent understanding of
the intellectual
foundations of this unit,
but also a strong ability to
bring these further (e.g.,
identifying main issues,
limitations, and
implications) and make
intellectual contributions to
related research or
practice.
⬜ The analysis
shows exceptional skills in
integrating key concepts
with originality.
Criteria N (fail) Pass (P) Credit (C) Distinction (D) High Distinction (HD)
Completeness and
correctness of arguments.
Are the arguments made by
the students well-reasoned
and evidence-based?
⬜ There is no clear
argument developed based
on the assigned topics.
Where arguments are
presented, there is no
evidence to back up claims.
There is thus a lack of
evidence that demonstrates
the students’ ability to
formulate ideas critically.
⬜ There are
arguments developed based
on the assigned topics. The
report contains evidence
drawn on the literature to
support the arguments.
However, some claims may
appear weak due to
insufficient support of quality
evidence or inconsistencies
in the arguments.
⬜ There are
arguments developed based
on the assigned topics,
which demonstrates a good
understanding of the
assigned topics. The
development of the
arguments draws upon
sufficient evidence from the
literature, though the
narrative may lack depth
(e.g., claims may need
stronger logic or broader
perspectives).
⬜ There are
arguments developed based
on the assigned topics,
which demonstrates a deep
understanding of the
assigned topics. The
development of the
arguments draws upon solid
evidence from a range of
literature, showing strong
academic rigor and validity.
The narrative is
sophisticated and
compelling.
⬜ There are
arguments developed based
on the assigned topics,
which demonstrates an
excellent understanding of
the assigned topics. The
development of the
arguments draws upon solid
evidence from a wide range
of literature, showing
exceptional academic rigor
and validity.
⬜ The narrative is
sophisticated and
compelling. The precision
and originality of the
arguments may provoke
thinking and contribute to
further conversation on
relevant topics.
Clarity of expression.
Is the writing coherent
throughout the report?
Can the students
communicate ideas clearly
using the expected writing
style?
⬜ The report has a
poor structure and lacks
clarity (e.g., unclear links
between sentences and
sections, incomplete or
conflicting narrative, or lack
of logic).
⬜ The report exhibits
inadequate command of the
technical aspects of writing
(e.g., grammar, punctuation,
spelling, and language
expressions).
⬜ The report is not
presented following the
recommended writing style.
⬜ The report has a
clear structure, though lacks
clarity (e.g., unclear links
between sentences and
sections, incomplete or
conflicting narrative, or lack
of logic).
⬜ The report exhibits
emerging skills of the
technical aspects of writing
(e.g., grammar, punctuation,
spelling, and language
expressions), which is yet to
mature.
⬜ The report is
presented following the
recommended writing style,
though without consistency.
⬜ The report has a
clear structure and sufficient
clarity (e.g., adequate links
between sentences and
sections, complete and
consistent narrative, and
coherence in the flow),
though there are occasional
inconsistencies.
⬜ The report exhibits
good skills of the technical
aspects of writing (e.g.,
grammar, punctuation,
spelling, and language
expressions).