Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: THEend8_
ECON30020 Mathematical Economics Assignment 3. Constrained optimization and envelope theorems Problem 1. Constrained optimization For Q ∈ [0, 1], let P (Q) = 1− 83Q, if Q ∈ [0, 1/4)4 9(1−Q) if Q ∈ [1/4, 1] (1) and R(Q) = P (Q)Q. Fix Q = 1/4 and solve the problem max Q1,Q2α (1− α)R(Q1) + αR(Q2) subject to Q1 ≤ Q, Q2 ≥ Q, α ∈ [0, 1] and (1− α)Q1 + αQ2 = Q. Which solution values vary with Q and which ones would be the same for, say, Q = 1/3? Hints: i) The constraints Q1 ≤ Q and Q2 ≥ Q will be slack, so you may neglect them in your approach; then you just need to verify that they are indeed slack at your solution values. ii) It may be simpler and clearer to work with general expression R when setting up and solving the Lagrangian, and to make use of the specific functional form only at the end when expressing the optimal values. Problem 2. Envelope theorems Consider a monopoly facing the inverse demand function P (Q) = 1 − Q for Q ∈ [0, 1] that has a constant marginal cost c ∈ (0, 1). Given Q and c, the monopoly’s profit is Π(Q, c) = (P (Q)− c)Q. Denote the maximizer for given c by Q∗(c) and partial derivatives by subscripts. Let pi(c) = maxQ Π(Q, c) = Π(Q ∗(c), c). a) Show that the first-order condition Π1(Q ∗(c), c) = 0 determines Q∗(c). b) Use the fact thatQ∗(c) is given by a first-order condition to establish that pi′(c) = Π2(Q∗(c), c). Verify that this is the case by computing Π(Q∗(c), c) and differentiating it with respect to c.. 2023 1 Page 1 of 2 ECON30020 Mathematical Economics Assignment 3.CO and ET c) Argue now that differentiability in Q is not material for the fact that pi′(c) = Π2(Q∗(c), c) by showing the payoff function Π(Q, c) satisfies all the relevant properties of the Milgrom-Segal envelope theorem (Theorem 3 in L6).