Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: THEend8_
ECOS3997: Interdisciplinary Impact in Economic Written Report Assessment Criteria
HD
85+
D
75-84
C
65-74
P
50-64
F
0-49
Weight
/ 100
Introduction
Clear and coherent
exposition of
background.
Compelling argument
for why the problem
is relevant from an
economic and policy
perspective.
Literature review is
relevant, accurate and
well-articulated.
Work is of outstanding
quality. A well written and
logically developed section
providing ample evidence on
background.
Clear and excellent
arguments for why the
problem is relevant from an
economic and policy
perspective.
The synthesis of literature
demonstrates depth of
understanding and insight.
Includes a clearly defined
objective for the report.
Work is of superior
quality. A well written and
logically developed
section providing ample
evidence on background.
Clear and very good
arguments for why the
problem is relevant from
an economic and policy
perspective.
The synthesis of literature
demonstrates depth of
understanding and insight.
Includes a clearly defined
objective for the report.
A sound attempt.
Background is logically
developed providing
ample evidence.
Clear and good
arguments for why the
problem is relevant from
an economic and policy
perspective.
The synthesis of
literature demonstrates a
good understanding and
insight.
Includes a clearly defined
objective for the report.
A satisfactory attempt.
Background provides
some evidence on
problem.
Attempt is made to
explain why the problem
is relevant from an
economic and policy
perspective.
The synthesis of
literature demonstrates
some level of
understanding and
insight.
Includes a clearly
defined objective for
the report.
An unsatisfactory
attempt.
Background does
not provides
inadequate
evidence on
problem.
Inadequate attempt
to explain why the
problem is relevant
from an economic
and policy
perspective.
The synthesis of
the literature
demonstrates no or
a poor
understanding of
the problem.
No or poorly
defined objective.
35
Analysis,
presentation and
discussion of
results.
Work is of outstanding
quality. Analysis is
relevant, complete, well-
executed, precise and clear.
Excellent description,
interpretation and critical
discussion of the results.
Work is of superior
quality. Analysis is
relevant, complete, well-
executed, precise and
clear. Very good
description, interpretation
and critical discussion of
the results.
A sound attempt.
Analysis is relevant,
well-executed, precise
and clear. Good
description,
interpretation and
critical discussion of the
results.
A satisfactory attempt.
Some of the analysis is
relevant and well-
executed. Satisfactory
description,
interpretation and
critical discussion of
the results.
An unsatisfactory
attempt. Most of
the analysis is not
relevant or well-
executed.
Unsatisfactory
description,
interpretation and
critical discussion
of the results.