Assessment title Individual project Brief Individual/group assessment Individual
Return and status of marked assessments: Within 4 weeks from the date of submission as per UCL guidelines. The module team will update you if there are delays through unforeseen circumstances (e.g. ill health). All results when first published are provisional until confirmed by the Examination Board. Copyright Note to students: Copyright of this assessment brief is with the module leader(s) named above. If this brief draws upon work by third parties (e.g. Case Study publishers) such third parties also hold copyright. It must not be copied, reproduced, transferred, distributed, leased, licensed or shared any other individual(s) and/or organisations, including web-based organisations, without permission of the copyright holder(s). Academic Misconduct: Academic Misconduct is defined as any action or attempted action that may result in a student obtaining an unfair academic advantage. Academic misconduct includes plagiarism, obtaining help from/sharing work with others be they individuals and/or organisations or any other form of cheating. Refer to Academic Manual Section 9: Student Academic Misconduct Procedure - 9.2 Definitions. Referencing: You must reference and provide full citation for ALL sources used, including articles, text books, lecture slides and module materials. This includes any direct quotes and paraphrased text. If in doubt, reference it. If you need further guidance on referencing please see UCL’s referencing tutorial for students here: https://library- guides.ucl.ac.uk/referencing-plagiarism/welcome. Failure to cite references correctly may result in your work being referred to the Academic Misconduct Panel. Content of this assessment brief Section Content A Core information B Coursework brief and requirements C Module learning outcomes covered in this assessment D How your work is assessed E Additional information
Published 18th July 2022
Section A: Core information
Submission date 01/08/2022 Submission time 10am Assessment is marked out of: 100 % weighting of this assessment within total module mark 100% Maximum word count/page length/duration 2000 Footnotes, appendices, tables, figures, diagrams, charts included in/excluded from word count/page length? Everything apart for the reference list, tables, graphs, and the appendices is included in the word count Bibliographies, reference lists included in/excluded from word count/page length? In-text references are included in the word count. The reference list is excluded from the word count. Penalty for exceeding word count/page length Standard UCL penalties for exceeding (deduction of 10 percentage points, capped at 40% for Levels 4,5, 6, and 50% for Level 7) Refer to Academic Manual Section 3: Module Assessment - 3.13 Word Counts.
Penalty for late submission Standard UCL penalties apply. Students should refer to Refer to https://www.ucl.ac.uk/academic-manual/chapters/chapter-4- assessment-framework-taught-programmes/section-3-module- assessment#3.12 Submitting your assessment Please submit your project to the Turnitin box ‘Individual project’ on the web site of Behavioural Finance, under the tab ‘Submissions’. Anonymity of identity. Normally, all submissions are anonymous unless the nature of the submission is such that anonymity is not appropriate, illustratively as in presentations or where minutes of group meetings are required as part of a group work submission The nature of this assessment is such that anonymity is required.
Published 18th July 2022
Section B: Assessment Brief and Requirements For the Behavioural Finance project, students are required to conduct research on topic of their choice, subject to the following conditions: 1. The project topic should be closely related to one of the topics taught in the course Behavioural Finance, including a. Judgment and decision making under uncertainty; prospect theory b. Central behaviour finance effects (e.g. attention effects and the disposition effect) c. Emotional finance theories d. Financial practitioner – client relationship e. Bank client behaviour f. Financial crime g. Ethics in Finance. 2. The topic should go beyond the existing Behavioural Finance literature. 3. It should be possible to study the topic using quantitative research methods. The use of qualitative research methods in addition to quantitative methods is optional. 4. The topic should enable research which is in line with the ethics requirements of the School of Management. If the research involves participants, it should satisfy the Ethics Code of Conduct of the British Psychology Society.
In particular, students are required to • Conduct a literature survey on their topic • Formulate a research question and two relevant hypotheses • Design a study to test the two hypotheses. The study can include an experiment, a survey, or analysis of secondary data • For studies involving experiments or surveys: submit an ethics form through the ethics form Turnitin box on the web site of the course. The work on the project is conditioned by an approval of the ethics form • Conduct the study • Analyse the data • Summarise and submit the literature survey, method, results, and conclusions in a write-up. Project submissions should be done to the Turnitin box ‘Individual projects’ on the web site of the course.
The write-ups should include: a. [15 marks] Introduction i. Background and literature review leading to the research question and two hypotheses. The literature review should include papers from peer- reviewed journal, but it can include also other sources of information. ii. An explanation about the importance of the research question. iii. An explanation about the contribution of the study to the literature (showing in which ways the study is original).
[Marking scheme: 10-15 marks: Challenging and innovative research question, which has important applications. The research question is closely related to at least one of the topics taught at the course. The hypotheses are related to the research question and are well-formulated. The research questions and the hypotheses clearly draw on contemporary Behavioural Finance research, including studies which were taught at the course Behavioural Finance.
Published 18th July 2022
5-9 marks: The research question is appropriate, but not innovative or somewhat related to one of the topics taught at the course. The hypotheses are satisfactorily stated. The relationship to the literature, to the contents of the course, and the applications lack some clarity or are modest.
0-5 marks: The research question or the hypotheses are poorly formulated, have unclear scope, or are not closely related to any of the topics taught at the course. The relationship to the literature is unclear or absent.]
b. [25 marks] Method i. Data sources (for experiments and surveys, that should include participants’ details. For studies using secondary data – the data sources). ii. Additional information about the data / materials used (for experiments and surveys – the materials, e.g. questionnaires, pictures, or graphs. For studies using secondary data – any additional relevant information about the data, e.g. data characteristics). iii. Study design (for experiments and surveys, this section should include the design and procedure of the study, independent variables, dependent variables, control variables, operational definitions, and procedure. For studies using secondary data – the independent variables, dependent variables, control variables and any other relevant methodological details).
[Marking scheme: 17-25 marks: The data sources are comprehensive and the design is thoughtful and relevant to the research question and hypotheses. The research methods used are robust. There is strong evidence of attention to details and critical thought about the method.
10-17 marks: The data sources are appropriate and the design is clear and relevant to the research question and hypotheses. The research methods used have many limitations. There is some evidence of attention to details.
0-10 marks: Poor research approach which lacks consideration of the chosen methods in terms of their suitability to the context of the research. There is little evidence of attention to details. The study has many limitations or important details are absent.]
c. [25 marks] Results, including hypothesis testing (and the statistical analysis details), qualitative analysis (in case the study involved also qualitative elements), explanations and interpretation.
[Marking scheme: 17-25 marks: The hypotheses are tested using relevant statistical methods and the results are interpreted correctly. The analysis and the presentation of results is outstanding or to a publishable standard. There is a clear contribution to knowledge.