Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: THEend8_
MGMT5050 Case Study Assignment
MGMT5050 – Case Study Assignment Marking Rubric
Criteria Unacceptable
Unsatisfactory
Pass
Credit
Distinction
High Distinction
Demonstrates knowledge and
understanding of context and case
Demonstrates little or no knowledge
of the case study
Knowledge of the case study is
weak, and superficial.
There are discrepancies in the level
of analysis of the selected issue and
the evidence presented.
No real application of models to
identify issues. There are multiple
inaccuracies in the facts, names of
important individuals, events and/or
relationships.
Marks: 7
Shows solid understanding of the
facts of the case appropriate for the
issue selected as the theme of the
report.
Evidence presented is appropriate
for the issue.
PEST or 5 Ws used but lacks depth.
There are minor inaccuracies in the
names of important individuals,
events and/or relationships.
Marks: 11
Shows solid understanding of the
facts of the case appropriate for the
issue selected as the theme of the
report.
Evidence presented is appropriate
for the issue and level of analysis.
PEST and 5 Ws are used. There are
no inaccuracies in the names of
important individuals, events and/or
relationships.
Marks: 14
Demonstrates a thorough grasp of
the facts of case, appropriate for the
issue selected as the theme of the
case study.
Evidence presented is appropriate
and extensive for the issue and level
of analysis.
Solid and applied use of PEST and 5
Ws. There are no inaccuracies in the
names of important individuals,
events and/or relationships.
Marks: 16
Develops a well-integrated statement
of the complexity of the case study in
relation to the issue selected.
Evidence presented is appropriate and
extensive for the issue and level of
analysis.
Solid and applied use of PEST and 5 Ws
to gain insight. There are no
inaccuracies in the names of important
individuals, events and/or
relationships.
Marks: 20
Critically analyses the problem(s)
using appropriate academic
concepts, theories and research
No academic sources used
Marks: 0
Uses less than the required
compulsory sources and/or too few
additional sources to critically
analyse the case study.
Marks: 10
Identifies and describes concepts
and theories appropriate for the
issues identified in the case study.
There is little acknowledgement of
alternative courses of action
Marks: 21
Engages in some critical analysis of
the problem (s) drawing on 3 set
articles and the 3 researched
academic sources.
The report presents a discussion of
possible alternative courses of
action. Uses the appropriate ethical
academic frameworks
Marks 24.5
Engages in critical analysis of the
problem drawing at least 3 set
articles and the 3 additional
academic sources.
Demonstrates a thorough grasp of
the case study and of complex
theoretical and conceptual models
and identifies and supports a
number of possible and realistic
alternatives. The integration of
concept to case study may on
occasion be cumbersome. Uses the
appropriate ethical academic
frameworks in a critical manner
Marks 28
Presents a sophisticated critical
analysis of the problem incorporating
at least the 3 set and additional 3
academic sources leading to a
sophisticated and complex analysis of
the problem, as well as to the
identification and discussion of
realistic alternatives. Uses the
appropriate ethical academic
frameworks in a critical manner with
depth of understanding
Marks: 35
Proposes recommendations to the
analysis/solution to the
problem(s) based on sound
evidence and concepts / theories
No recommendations/solution
proposed in the report.
Marks: 0
Describes recommendations/
solution to the case study. There is
little evidence to link the proposed
solution to the analysis of the
problem or alternatives.